The Theme of the Self and the Relationship Between Psychoanalysis and Neuroscience

Giorgio Mattana

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ajpn.20210904.19

| Peer-Reviewed

The Theme of the Self and the Relationship Between Psychoanalysis and Neuroscience

Giorgio Mattana

Published in American Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience (Volume 9, Issue 4)

Received: 29 November 2021 Accepted: 23 December 2021 Published: 29 December 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The theme of the Self helps to enlighten the relationship «by difference» between psychoanalysis and neuroscience. They in fact investigate human subjectivity by different methods, conceptual and linguistic systems. The psychoanalytical models of the Self as the experience that everyone has of himself and the psychoanalytical models of the Self as a set of representations within the Ego, easily converge towards an unified theory of subjectivity. The comparison with the main neurobiological models of the Self shows that the aim of founding this theory to a neurobiological ground encounters great empirical and logical difficulties. This highlights the limits of the program of the reduction-identification of psychoanalytical with neurobiological concepts, based on finding correlations «point-by-point» between the two disciplines. The «correlationism» driving the comparisons between psychoanalysis and neuroscience subtends the neurobiological foundation of psychoanalysis and its ontological and methodological subordination to neuroscience. The relationship between the two disciplinary areas proposed in this work is based instead on the principle of the difference of perspectives and of the complexity of reality. It substitutes the aim of the reduction-identification of psychoanalytical with neurobiological concepts with an epistemological pluralism promoting their dialectical confrontation in sight of the continuos deepening of the knowledge of human subjectivity.

Published in	American Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience (Volume 9, Issue 4)
DOI	10.11648/j.ajpn.20210904.19
Page(s)	189-200
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Complexity, Ego, Epistemological Pluralism, Neuroscience, Psychoanalysis, Reduction-Identification, Self, Subjectivity

References

[1]	Hautamäki A. (2018). Viewpoint relativism. A new approach to epistemological relativism based on the concept of points of view. Cham, Springer, 2020.
[2]	Coliva A., Pedersen N. (2017). Epistemic pluralism. Cham, Palgrave Macmillan.
[3]	Rovelli C. (2020). Helgoland. Milano, Adelphi.
[4]	Candiotto L., Pezzano G. (2019). Filosofia delle relazioni. Genova, Il melangolo.
[5]	Mattana G. (2020). Il confronto fra modelli e la scientificità della psicoanalisi. Riv. Psicoanal., 3, 739-749.
[6]	Laplanche J., Pontalis J. B. (1973). The language of psycho-analysis. New York, Norton.
[7]	Schlesinger G., Groisman R., Maestro S. (eds). «Self». In: IPA Inter-Regional Encyclopedic Dictionary of Psychoanalysis (in progress). https://online.flippingbook.com/view/544664/322/.
[8]	Freud S. (1923). The ego and the id. SE 19: 1-66.
[9]	Freud S. (1926). Inhibitions, symptoms and anxiety. SE 20: 75-176.
[10]	Freud S. (1914). On narcissism: an introduction. SE 14: 67-102.
[11]	Freud S. (1917). Mourning and melancholia. SE 14: 237-258.
[12]	Freud S. (1930). Civilization and its discontents. SE 21: 57-146.
[13]	Freud S. (1940a). An Outline of psychoanalysis. SE 23: 139-208.
[14]	Freud S. (1940b). Splitting of the ego in the process of defence. SE 23: 271-278.
[15]	Kernberg O. F. (1982). Self, ego, affects, and drives. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn. 30 (4): 893-917.
[16]	Klein M. (1935). A contribution to the psychogenesis of manic-depressive states. In: The writings of Melanie Klein, vol. 1. London, Karnac & The Institute of Psychoanalysis, 1992.
[17]	Klein M. (1946). Notes on some schizoid mechanisms. In: The writings of Melanie Klein, vol. 3. London, Karnac & The Institute of Psychoanalysis, 1993.
[18]	Klein M. (1959). Our adult world and its roots in infancy. In: The writings of Melanie Klein, vol 3. London, Karnac & The Institute of Psychoanalysis, 1993.
[19]	Jervis G. (1990). Significato e malintesi del concetto di «Sé». In: Ammaniti M. (ed.) La nascita del Sé. Roma-Bari, Laterza.
[20]	Gabbard G. O. (1992). Psychodynamic psychiatry in clinical practice. Washington, American Psychiatric Press.
[21]	Fairbairn W. R. D. (1952). Psychoanalytic studies of the personality. London, Tavistock Publications Limited.
[22]	Winnicott D. N. (1965). The maturational process and the facilitating environment. Studies in the theory of emotional development. London, The Hogarth Press and The Institute of Psychoanalysis.
[23]	Winnicott D. N. (1971). Playing and reality. London, Tavistock Publications.
[24]	Pontalis J. B. (1977). Tra il sogno e il dolore. Roma, Borla, 1988.
[25]	Duruz N. (1985). I concetti di narcisismo, Io e Sé nella psicoanalisi e nella psicologia. Roma, Astrolabio, 1987.
[26]	Greenberg J. R., Mitchell S. A. (1983). Object relations in psychoanalytic theory. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
[27]	Kohut H. (1971). The analysis of the self. New York, International Universities Press.
[28]	Kohut H. (1977). The restoration of the self. New York, International Universities Press.
[29]	Kohut H. (1984). How does analysis cure? Chicago and London, University of Chicago Press.
[30]	Eagle M. N. (1984). Recent developments in psychoanalysis. A critical evaluation. New York, McGraw-Hill.
[31]	Stern D. N. (1985). The interpersonal world of the infant. A view from psychoanalysis and developmental psychology. New York, Basic Books.
[32]	Stern D. N. (1990). La nascita del Sé. In: Ammaniti M. (ed.) La nascita del Sé. Roma-Bari, Laterza.
[33]	Emde R. N. (1990). Gli affetti nello sviluppo del Sé infantile. In: Ammaniti M., Dazzi N (eds.) Affetti. Natura e sviluppo delle relazioni interpersonali. Roma-Bari, Laterza.
[34]	Bollas C. (1987). The Shadow of the Object. Psychoanalysis of the unthought known. London, Free Association Books.
[35]	Bollas C. (1989). Forces of Destiny. Psychoanalysis and human idiom. London, Free Association Books.
[36]	Bromberg, P. M. (1998). Standing in the spaces. Essays on clinical process, trauma, and dissociation. New Jersey, Analytic Press.
[37]	Bromberg, P. M. (2006). Awakening the dreamer. Clinical journeys. New Jersey, Analytic Press.
[38]	Bromberg, P. M. (2011). The shadow of the tsunami. And the growth of the relational mind. New York, Routledge.
[39]	Mitchell S. A. (1991). Contemporary perspectives on self: towards an integration. Psychoanal. Dial. 1 (2): 121-147.
[40]	Hartmann H. (1950). Comments on the psychoanalytic theory of the ego. In: Hartmann H. (1964). Essays on ego psychology. New York, International Universities Press, 1964.
[41]	Jacobson E. (1964). The self and the object world. New York, International Universities Press.
[42]	Mahler M., Pine F., Bergman A. (1975). The psychological birth of the human infant. Symbiosis and individuation. New York, Basic Books.
[43]	Kernberg O. F. (2015). Neurobiological correlates of object relations theory. The relationship between neurobiological and psychodynamic development. Int. Forum Psychoanal. 24 (1): 38-46.
[44]	Grinberg L., Grinberg R. (1975). Identitad y cambio. Buenos Aires, Editorial Nova.
[45]	Wisdom J. O. (1961). A methodological approach to the problem of hysteria. Int. J. Psychoanal. 42 (3): 1961.
[46]	Bolognini S. (1991). Gli affetti dell’analista: analisi con l’Io e analisi col Sé. Riv. Psicoanal. 2, 339-371.
[47]	James W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York, Dover Publications.
[48]	Di Francesco M., Marraffa M., Paternoster A. (2016). The Self and its Defences – From Psychodynamics to Cognitive Science. London, Palgrave Macmillan.
[49]	Dennett D. C. (1991). Consciousness explained. Boston-Toronto-London, Little, Brown and Company.
[50]	Feyerabend P. K. (1963). Materialism and the mind-body problem. In: Borst C. V. (ed.). The mind/brain identity theory. New York, Macmillan, 1970.
[51]	Rorty R. (1970). Mind-body identity, privacy, categories. The review of metaphysics 19 (1): 24-54.
[52]	Churchland P. S. (1986). Neurophilosophy. Cambridge (MA), The MIT Press.
[53]	Churchland P. M. (1989). A neurocomputational perspective. The nature of mind and the structure of science. Cambridge, MIT Press.
[54]	Di Francesco M. (2002). Introduzione alla filosofia della mente. Roma, Carocci.
[55]	Gazzaniga M. S. (1998). The mind’s past. Berkeley, University of California Press.
[56]	Metzinger T. (2009). The ego tunnel. The science of the mind and the myth of the self. New York, Basic Books.
[57]	Baars B. J. (1988). A cognitive theory of consciousness. Cambridge, Cambridge Univ. Press.
[58]	Baars B. J. (1997). In the theatre of consciousness: the workspace of the mind. Oxford, Oxford Univ. Press.
[59]	Dehaene S. (2014). Consciousness and the brain. Deciphering how the brain codes our thoughts. New York, Viking.
[60]	Damasio A. (2010). The self comes to mind. Constructing the conscious brain. New York, Pantheon Books.
[61]	Panksepp J., Biven L. (2012). The archaeology of mind. Neuroevolutionary origins of human emotions. New York, Norton & Company.
[62]	Solms M. (2017). «The unconscious» in psychoanalysis and neuroscience: an integrated approach to the cognitive unconscious. In: Craparo G. and Mucci C. (eds.). Unrepressed unconscious, implicit memory, and clinical work. London, Karnac.
[63]	Panksepp J., Davis K. L. (2018). The emotional foundations of personality. A neurobiological and evolutionary approach. New York, Norton & Company.
[64]	Edelman G. (1989). The remembered present. A biological theory of consciousness. New York, Basic Books.
[65]	Edelman G. (1992). Bright air, brilliant fire. On the matter of the brain. New York, Basic Books.
[66]	Northoff G., Bermpohl F. (2004). Cortical midline structures and the self. Trends in cognitive sciences 8 (3): 102-107.
[67]	Northoff G. (2016). Neuro-philosophy and the healthy mind. Learning from the unwell brain. New York, W. W. Norton & Company.
[68]	Schaefer M., Northoff G. (2017). Who am I: The Conscious and the Unconscious Self. Front. Hum. Neurosci. Published online Mar 17. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00126.
[69]	Minsky M. (1986). The society of mind. New York, Simon and Schuster.
[70]	Mattana G. (2017). Psicoanalisi e filosofia della mente: il problema mente/cervello e il rapporto con le neuroscienze. Riv. Psicoanal. 1, 75-94.
[71]	Mattana G. (2020). L’irriducibilità della psicoanalisi e la relazione con le neuroscienze. L’inconscio. Rivista Italiana di Psicoanalisi e Filosofia, 10, 103-126, dicembre 2020 DOI: 10.19226/162.
[72]	Di Francesco M., Marraffa M., Tomasetta A. (2017). Filosofia della mente. Corpo, coscienza, pensiero. Roma, Carocci.
[73]	Nannini S. (2002). L’anima e il corpo. Un’introduzione storica alla filosofia della mente. Roma-Bari, Laterza.
[74]	Paternoster A. (2002). Introduzione alla filosofia della mente. Roma-Bari, Laterza.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Giorgio Mattana. (2021). The Theme of the Self and the Relationship Between Psychoanalysis and Neuroscience. American Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, 9(4), 189-200. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpn.20210904.19

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Giorgio Mattana. The Theme of the Self and the Relationship Between Psychoanalysis and Neuroscience. Am. J. Psychiatry Neurosci. 2021, 9(4), 189-200. doi: 10.11648/j.ajpn.20210904.19

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Giorgio Mattana. The Theme of the Self and the Relationship Between Psychoanalysis and Neuroscience. Am J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2021;9(4):189-200. doi: 10.11648/j.ajpn.20210904.19

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajpn.20210904.19,
  author = {Giorgio Mattana},
  title = {The Theme of the Self and the Relationship Between Psychoanalysis and Neuroscience},
  journal = {American Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience},
  volume = {9},
  number = {4},
  pages = {189-200},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajpn.20210904.19},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpn.20210904.19},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajpn.20210904.19},
  abstract = {The theme of the Self helps to enlighten the relationship «by difference» between psychoanalysis and neuroscience. They in fact investigate human subjectivity by different methods, conceptual and linguistic systems. The psychoanalytical models of the Self as the experience that everyone has of himself and the psychoanalytical models of the Self as a set of representations within the Ego, easily converge towards an unified theory of subjectivity. The comparison with the main neurobiological models of the Self shows that the aim of founding this theory to a neurobiological ground encounters great empirical and logical difficulties. This highlights the limits of the program of the reduction-identification of psychoanalytical with neurobiological concepts, based on finding correlations «point-by-point» between the two disciplines. The «correlationism» driving the comparisons between psychoanalysis and neuroscience subtends the neurobiological foundation of psychoanalysis and its ontological and methodological subordination to neuroscience. The relationship between the two disciplinary areas proposed in this work is based instead on the principle of the difference of perspectives and of the complexity of reality. It substitutes the aim of the reduction-identification of psychoanalytical with neurobiological concepts with an epistemological pluralism promoting their dialectical confrontation in sight of the continuos deepening of the knowledge of human subjectivity.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - The Theme of the Self and the Relationship Between Psychoanalysis and Neuroscience
AU  - Giorgio Mattana
Y1  - 2021/12/29
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpn.20210904.19
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajpn.20210904.19
T2  - American Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience
JF  - American Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience
JO  - American Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience
SP  - 189
EP  - 200
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-426X
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpn.20210904.19
AB  - The theme of the Self helps to enlighten the relationship «by difference» between psychoanalysis and neuroscience. They in fact investigate human subjectivity by different methods, conceptual and linguistic systems. The psychoanalytical models of the Self as the experience that everyone has of himself and the psychoanalytical models of the Self as a set of representations within the Ego, easily converge towards an unified theory of subjectivity. The comparison with the main neurobiological models of the Self shows that the aim of founding this theory to a neurobiological ground encounters great empirical and logical difficulties. This highlights the limits of the program of the reduction-identification of psychoanalytical with neurobiological concepts, based on finding correlations «point-by-point» between the two disciplines. The «correlationism» driving the comparisons between psychoanalysis and neuroscience subtends the neurobiological foundation of psychoanalysis and its ontological and methodological subordination to neuroscience. The relationship between the two disciplinary areas proposed in this work is based instead on the principle of the difference of perspectives and of the complexity of reality. It substitutes the aim of the reduction-identification of psychoanalytical with neurobiological concepts with an epistemological pluralism promoting their dialectical confrontation in sight of the continuos deepening of the knowledge of human subjectivity.
VL  - 9
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Giorgio Mattana

Italian Psychoanalytical Society (SPI), Rome, Italy

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Giorgio Mattana. (2021). The Theme of the Self and the Relationship Between Psychoanalysis and Neuroscience. American Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, 9(4), 189-200. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpn.20210904.19

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Giorgio Mattana. The Theme of the Self and the Relationship Between Psychoanalysis and Neuroscience. Am. J. Psychiatry Neurosci. 2021, 9(4), 189-200. doi: 10.11648/j.ajpn.20210904.19

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Giorgio Mattana. The Theme of the Self and the Relationship Between Psychoanalysis and Neuroscience. Am J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2021;9(4):189-200. doi: 10.11648/j.ajpn.20210904.19

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajpn.20210904.19,
  author = {Giorgio Mattana},
  title = {The Theme of the Self and the Relationship Between Psychoanalysis and Neuroscience},
  journal = {American Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience},
  volume = {9},
  number = {4},
  pages = {189-200},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajpn.20210904.19},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpn.20210904.19},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajpn.20210904.19},
  abstract = {The theme of the Self helps to enlighten the relationship «by difference» between psychoanalysis and neuroscience. They in fact investigate human subjectivity by different methods, conceptual and linguistic systems. The psychoanalytical models of the Self as the experience that everyone has of himself and the psychoanalytical models of the Self as a set of representations within the Ego, easily converge towards an unified theory of subjectivity. The comparison with the main neurobiological models of the Self shows that the aim of founding this theory to a neurobiological ground encounters great empirical and logical difficulties. This highlights the limits of the program of the reduction-identification of psychoanalytical with neurobiological concepts, based on finding correlations «point-by-point» between the two disciplines. The «correlationism» driving the comparisons between psychoanalysis and neuroscience subtends the neurobiological foundation of psychoanalysis and its ontological and methodological subordination to neuroscience. The relationship between the two disciplinary areas proposed in this work is based instead on the principle of the difference of perspectives and of the complexity of reality. It substitutes the aim of the reduction-identification of psychoanalytical with neurobiological concepts with an epistemological pluralism promoting their dialectical confrontation in sight of the continuos deepening of the knowledge of human subjectivity.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - The Theme of the Self and the Relationship Between Psychoanalysis and Neuroscience
AU  - Giorgio Mattana
Y1  - 2021/12/29
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpn.20210904.19
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajpn.20210904.19
T2  - American Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience
JF  - American Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience
JO  - American Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience
SP  - 189
EP  - 200
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-426X
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpn.20210904.19
AB  - The theme of the Self helps to enlighten the relationship «by difference» between psychoanalysis and neuroscience. They in fact investigate human subjectivity by different methods, conceptual and linguistic systems. The psychoanalytical models of the Self as the experience that everyone has of himself and the psychoanalytical models of the Self as a set of representations within the Ego, easily converge towards an unified theory of subjectivity. The comparison with the main neurobiological models of the Self shows that the aim of founding this theory to a neurobiological ground encounters great empirical and logical difficulties. This highlights the limits of the program of the reduction-identification of psychoanalytical with neurobiological concepts, based on finding correlations «point-by-point» between the two disciplines. The «correlationism» driving the comparisons between psychoanalysis and neuroscience subtends the neurobiological foundation of psychoanalysis and its ontological and methodological subordination to neuroscience. The relationship between the two disciplinary areas proposed in this work is based instead on the principle of the difference of perspectives and of the complexity of reality. It substitutes the aim of the reduction-identification of psychoanalytical with neurobiological concepts with an epistemological pluralism promoting their dialectical confrontation in sight of the continuos deepening of the knowledge of human subjectivity.
VL  - 9
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download