This paper analyzes the significance of mine gas grade identification, that is, dividing the mine into different gas grades, selecting different grades of explosion-proof equipment, selecting different technical protective equipment and implementing different ventilation gas management systems according to the air volume required for different supply of mine gas grades, and implementing graded management, which is economical, reasonable, safe and reliable to ensure mine safety production. According to the commonly used gas grade identification methods, the factors affecting the identification results are analyzed. Through the comparison of a large number of identification data, the analysis and research shows that the identification time, mine output and calculation method are the three main factors affecting the identification results. The problems easily occurred in the appraisal process are analyzed, mainly including the layout of appraisal measuring points, the analysis of mine gas source is not specific, the test of mine air volume data is not accurate, the calculation results of mine gas appraisal are wrong, and the influence of mining geological factors on gas emission is not considered. According to the influencing factors, this paper puts forward three corresponding countermeasures to improve understanding, strengthen organization and leadership and improve training quality, which has certain guiding significance to improve the accuracy of appraisal results.
Published in | International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering (Volume 10, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ogce.20221002.11 |
Page(s) | 50-54 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Gas Grade, Identification Time, Mine Output, Countermeasure Research
[1] | TANG Bendong. Method and analysis of determination of gas content in surrounding rock in Germany [J]. Coal Mine Safety, 1997 (8). |
[2] | YU Bufan et al. Coal Mine Gas Disaster Prevention and Utilization Manual [M]. Bei jing: Coal Industry Press, 2000. |
[3] | WANG Youan et al. Coal Mine Safety Manual - Gas Prevention and Control in mines [M]. Bei jing: Coal Industry Press, 1994. |
[4] | HE Xueqiu. Rheological dynamics of gas bearing coal and rock [M]. Xu zhou: China University of mining and Technology Press, 1995. |
[5] | Prediction method of mine gas emission [S]. State Administration of work safety, 2006. |
[6] | SHAO Yang, KANG Yu. Prediction of gas emission in coal face based on multiple linear regression [J]. Coal technology, 2021 (04): 118-121. |
[7] | ZHANG Jinsong. Indirect determination of gas content in limestone rock mass and its application in prediction of gas emission in working face [J]. Coal mine safety, 2012, 43 (12): 72-75. |
[8] | ZHANG Jinsong, LIU Wenbo, QU Xiaoming etc. Analysis on the relationship between residual gas content and exposure time of falling coal in Yangquan mining area 3# seam [J]. Coal mine safety, 2008, 39 (10): 86-89. |
[9] | SUN Jianhua, ZHANG Zhili, SHI Qian etc. Prediction of gas emission based on principal component stepwise regression analysis [J]. Coal engineering, 2020 (01): 89-115. |
[10] | CHENG Bo, YAN Wenxue, YANG Liang etc. Study on prediction method of coal mine gas emission [J]. Chinese coal, 2019, 45 (11): 63-67. |
[11] | FENG Huoliang. Discussion on the accuracy of coal mine gas grade identification in China [J]. Shanxi youth, 2018 (10): 63-67. |
[12] | LI Hao. Discussion on identification method of coal mine gas grade [J]. Scientific and technological style, 2012 (12): 15-18. |
[13] | CHENG Shaoren, CHENG Jianjun. Problems and Countermeasures of coal mine gas grade identification [J]. Chinese coal, 2004 (10): 25-29. |
[14] | WANG Changbin. Change of gas emission during two shifts of production and its influence on gas grade identification [J]. Coal mine safety, 2001 (03): 38-41. |
[15] | YAN Qunlu, CHENG Jianjun, CHENG Shaoren. Problems and Countermeasures of coal mine gas grade identification [J]. Coal engineering, 2004 (08): 56-60. |
APA Style
Zhang Jinsong. (2022). Study on Influencing Factors and Countermeasures of Mine Gas Grade Identification. International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering, 10(2), 50-54. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ogce.20221002.11
ACS Style
Zhang Jinsong. Study on Influencing Factors and Countermeasures of Mine Gas Grade Identification. Int. J. Oil Gas Coal Eng. 2022, 10(2), 50-54. doi: 10.11648/j.ogce.20221002.11
AMA Style
Zhang Jinsong. Study on Influencing Factors and Countermeasures of Mine Gas Grade Identification. Int J Oil Gas Coal Eng. 2022;10(2):50-54. doi: 10.11648/j.ogce.20221002.11
@article{10.11648/j.ogce.20221002.11, author = {Zhang Jinsong}, title = {Study on Influencing Factors and Countermeasures of Mine Gas Grade Identification}, journal = {International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering}, volume = {10}, number = {2}, pages = {50-54}, doi = {10.11648/j.ogce.20221002.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ogce.20221002.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ogce.20221002.11}, abstract = {This paper analyzes the significance of mine gas grade identification, that is, dividing the mine into different gas grades, selecting different grades of explosion-proof equipment, selecting different technical protective equipment and implementing different ventilation gas management systems according to the air volume required for different supply of mine gas grades, and implementing graded management, which is economical, reasonable, safe and reliable to ensure mine safety production. According to the commonly used gas grade identification methods, the factors affecting the identification results are analyzed. Through the comparison of a large number of identification data, the analysis and research shows that the identification time, mine output and calculation method are the three main factors affecting the identification results. The problems easily occurred in the appraisal process are analyzed, mainly including the layout of appraisal measuring points, the analysis of mine gas source is not specific, the test of mine air volume data is not accurate, the calculation results of mine gas appraisal are wrong, and the influence of mining geological factors on gas emission is not considered. According to the influencing factors, this paper puts forward three corresponding countermeasures to improve understanding, strengthen organization and leadership and improve training quality, which has certain guiding significance to improve the accuracy of appraisal results.}, year = {2022} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Study on Influencing Factors and Countermeasures of Mine Gas Grade Identification AU - Zhang Jinsong Y1 - 2022/03/23 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ogce.20221002.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ogce.20221002.11 T2 - International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering JF - International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering JO - International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering SP - 50 EP - 54 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2376-7677 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ogce.20221002.11 AB - This paper analyzes the significance of mine gas grade identification, that is, dividing the mine into different gas grades, selecting different grades of explosion-proof equipment, selecting different technical protective equipment and implementing different ventilation gas management systems according to the air volume required for different supply of mine gas grades, and implementing graded management, which is economical, reasonable, safe and reliable to ensure mine safety production. According to the commonly used gas grade identification methods, the factors affecting the identification results are analyzed. Through the comparison of a large number of identification data, the analysis and research shows that the identification time, mine output and calculation method are the three main factors affecting the identification results. The problems easily occurred in the appraisal process are analyzed, mainly including the layout of appraisal measuring points, the analysis of mine gas source is not specific, the test of mine air volume data is not accurate, the calculation results of mine gas appraisal are wrong, and the influence of mining geological factors on gas emission is not considered. According to the influencing factors, this paper puts forward three corresponding countermeasures to improve understanding, strengthen organization and leadership and improve training quality, which has certain guiding significance to improve the accuracy of appraisal results. VL - 10 IS - 2 ER -